The
bourgeois media and the Democratic party machine were confounded by Mitt Romney’s
invocation of Big Bird during the first US presidential debate, a sentiment
that soon gave way to cynical amusement and playground mockery. But Romney had
inadvertently revealed a deep truth about the Capitalist canon’s troubled relationship
with oversized birds. Birds at once represent freedom, a visual cliché widely
used by Liberal parties around the world depicting a bird in flight, never in
repose, and the possibility of being devoured by the feathered creatures that
have learned to negotiate gravity far better than un-mechanised humans could
ever do. Romney’s Big Bird metaphor deserves more analysis than it was given by
the mainstream media arm of the post-wage capitalist complex.
Icarus
meets Hitchcock
Alfred
Hitchcock’s The Birds was a seminal revelatory moment of this troubled
relationship with avian species that capitalism has obsessed about. Hitchcock’s
vision was the inverted dystopia of that fragile peace we have established with
birds through an economy of breadcrumbs. It is not accidental that the
Reagan-Thatcher trickle-down effect has also been discussed in terms of
breadcrumbs. Abandoning social safety nets for the sake of an organic
redistribution mechanism driven by aggressive growth was a central pillar of
the Late Capitalist Order of the 80s, the Thatcherite fantasy of forcing more
and more people to leave the perceived safety of the welfare state nest, if you
excuse the pun.
Now let us pause
and think, who are Romney’s political idols? Isn’t his carefully arranged hair
itself a homage to Reagan’s cinematic history and Thatcher’s post-housewife
persona? In fact, Romney encapsulates more of Thatcher than Reagan, particularly
in relationship to Lacan’s discussion of the inverted gender subsequence that
traces the ideology of the self among the ruling class. Accidental? I don’t
think so. British friends tell me about Thatcher’s attempt to destroy the BBC,
and her particular irritation with Spitting Image. If I were
conspiratorially minded, I would remind you of what Big Bird and Spitting
Image have in common: they are puppets. But I will leave you to draw that
conclusion on your own.
Being
Engulfed by the Feathered Being
Romney’s
choice of words was very interesting, in the sense that Freud described when he
developed the idea that what is said is not important, but how you can reinterpret
it. To remind ourselves, Romney said ‘I love Big Bird’. Love. Curious choice of
words. Love is the word we use to imply gluttony, as in ‘I love McDonald’s’ or ‘I
love Dunkin' Donuts’. The Republican candidate wasn’t making a reference to
public funding cuts directly, he wants to devour the flying nemesis, the
feathered image of ourselves that has been repeatedly defeated since Icarus.
But as
Hitchcock reminded us, we could be devoured by the birds first. Romney in fact
is taking Blair and Bush’s pre-emptive war mantra to the next step, the action preceding
the conceptualisation, a total continuous state of pre-emptive wars that
perpetuates the vigilant condition and with it the total subjugation of the
post-recession exhausted working classes. Romney’s fantasy is that of perpetual
war against the winged malice.
On the
Levantine UFO
Coincidentally, a few days after Romney made his
declaration of war against Big Bird, Israeli jets intercepted and shot down an
unidentified flying object. Unidentified Flying object. ‘Unidentified’ is
of course a reference to Donald Rumsfeld’s ‘unknown unknowns’, the possibility
that there is a man with knife hiding behind the shower curtain, but also other
possibilities that we haven’t even conceived of. But more interesting is the
reference to a flying object. Object is a distraction, it denies our flying
friend agency to pretend it’s a machine, in fact it is a flying subject, no
other than our winged nemesis, which Romney had just declared war against. Accidental?
Given Israel’s desperation to reinvent its cold-war role as a regional
spearhead of US hegemony, that is highly unlikely.
The Yugoslav
Army, because I always talk about that
When I was
in the Yugoslav army, we would often wonder into the woods and shoot down the
local Virga bird. We would also tell lots of filthy jokes, like the one
about the psychiatrist coming back home to find his wife sleeping with his
patient’s alter ego. Eventually we discovered that in all our dialects and
languages the penis was referred to euphemistically as the ‘bird’. The act of
internalising the winged nemesis as the implement of sexual violence.
It’s
foolish to think of Big Bird as an innocent character for children’s
entertainment. For that, a small or medium bird would have been enough. Big
Bird is an ambassador, a peace envoy, symbolically constructed as a mark of the
working relationship between man and bird that prevents the pigeons from taking
over the whole place in return for breadcrumbs. Romney seems dangerously close
to attempting a coup at that decades-long mutual understanding and simultaneously
resurrect the war economy. As Lenin would have said, we need to clip his wings.
Robert Fisk: Reporting from Syria ‘with sensational quotes in the headline’
Syria is Iraq and something about a midwife. By Thomas Friedman.
Follow me on Twitter.
You might like these other parodies:
Robert Fisk: Reporting from Syria ‘with sensational quotes in the headline’
Syria is Iraq and something about a midwife. By Thomas Friedman.
Follow me on Twitter.
Dafuq did I just read?
ReplyDeleteAAAND I just realized it was a parody. Nevermind...
DeleteProbably the second best parody of Zizek I've read, after anything by Zizek himself. The guy's become a spoof of pretentious, willfully obtuse Marxist academics. To employ a bit of the Zizekian psuedo-dialectic: the quantity of ponderous self-satisfied pop-Lacanian analysis he produces has reached the point where it qualitatively transforms into its own punchline. I do admire his prodigious work ethic, though. He's like the Robert Pollard of philosophy, only less consistent.
ReplyDeleteWell done!
ReplyDelete